Your current location is:FTI News > Foreign News
Internal conflict on the U.S. side during U.S.
FTI News2025-08-02 00:24:22【Foreign News】7People have watched
IntroductionDownload the China Foreign Exchange Trading Center app,Foreign exchange gto dealer,Fifth Round of Trade Talks Stalls, Japan Says "No Consensus Yet"On the afternoon of June 6
Fifth Round of Trade Talks Stalls,Download the China Foreign Exchange Trading Center app Japan Says "No Consensus Yet"
On the afternoon of June 6, local time, the fifth round of ministerial-level trade talks between the United States and Japan was held in Washington, focusing on discussions surrounding the high tariff policy led by the Trump administration. However, despite Japan's claim of "further progress," the two sides have yet to reach a consensus on key issues.
Japan's Minister for Economic Revitalization, Ryozo Akazawa, stated after the meeting that the atmosphere of the talks was complex, and no specific agreements have been reached. Japanese media pointed out that this round of talks once again highlighted the disarray and inconsistency in the U.S.'s economic and trade stance towards Japan.
Dispute Among U.S. Representatives, Japanese Side "Left Out"
According to reports from Japanese media cited by the United Daily News, during the negotiations, evident disagreements arose among three key U.S. officials—Treasury Secretary Besent, Commerce Secretary Lutenick, and Trade Representative Greer. These differences even led to public arguments on-site, leaving the Japanese representatives sidelined and creating an awkward scene.
This internal dispute within the U.S. delegation puzzled the Japanese. An accompanying Japanese official noted that the severe division of opinions made it "difficult to determine the true intentions of the Trump administration."
Internal Strife Among Three Senior U.S. Officials: Divergent Stances
According to insiders, not only are there overlaps in their duties among these three senior U.S. officials, but there are also significant differences in their political backgrounds and stances on tariff policies. Besent, a Wall Street veteran with a mild demeanor, was crucial in pushing for a 90-day delay in implementing "reciprocal tariffs," suggesting a moderate stance. In contrast, Lutenick advocates for a tough trade protection policy, demanding more concessions from Japan.
Sources suggest that these three are competing with each other to showcase their abilities in negotiation, aiming to win Trump's favor and gain more political capital. This "internal competition" has directly led to the inefficiency of the talks.
Japan Hopes for High-Level Meetings During G7
Facing the current impasse in the talks, Japan has set its sights on the upcoming G7 Summit in Canada this month. Japanese media reports that Japan is actively seeking to facilitate a formal meeting between Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and President Trump during the summit to overcome the current deadlock and reach a substantive agreement.
Japanese government officials hope that direct high-level dialogue will clarify the true stance of the U.S. and prevent a repeat of the confusion caused by middle-level officials "speaking at cross-purposes."
Internal Chaos in the U.S. Undermines Trust in Negotiations
Experts point out that the lack of a unified position within the U.S. delegation not only significantly slows down the negotiation process but also impacts the trust of their partners. Japan is currently in a passive position, facing multiple pressures from the U.S. while finding it challenging to judge whether the final negotiation results will be consistent and sustainable.
Some analysts bluntly stated: "If the U.S. high-level officials do not quickly unify their voices, even if Shigeru Ishiba and Trump successfully conclude a meeting, it will still be difficult to truly advance the implementation of an agreement."
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Very good!(16923)
Related articles
- Detailed explanation of TMGM Forex trading platform rebate policy: How to maximize your earnings.
- Market Insights: March 5th, 2024
- The March Caixin China Manufacturing PMI was 50.9, indicating an expansion trend.
- Saudi Arabia readies $40 billion venture fund for AI investment. Will it spark new growth?
- The Inside Connection Between UbitEx and Fintouch: How a New Scam Repeats Old Tricks?
- Market Insights: March 5th, 2024
- Market Insights: Feb 27th, 2024
- Caution! LegacyFX excludes Chinese clients! Beware of deceptive brokers!
- Surveys indicate that house prices in the UK will fall by 4% in 2023.
- Revocation Turmoil: Cyprus Regulatory Authority Revokes Licenses Amid Surge
Popular Articles
Webmaster recommended
Driss IFC is a Scam: Beware!
Market Insights: Feb 28th, 2024
Market Insights: Feb 28th, 2024
Maxain tout unlicensed work with 1:1000 leverage, spouting nonsense!
Lioppa Global Markets Ltd Review: Suspected of Fraud
Market Insights: Feb 28th, 2024
Caution! LegacyFX excludes Chinese clients! Beware of deceptive brokers!
Market Insights: Mar 8th, 2024